Skip to content
CSRD-Ready Sustainability Platform · Berlin / SF
CSRD-READY SUSTAINABILITY PLATFORM Customer Index · Q1 2026

How 2,400+ mid-market sustainability teams cut reporting time by 67% and reached CSRD audit readiness 4.6× faster than the 11-month median.

Four industries. Anonymized operators. The metrics a Head of Sustainability can quote to a CFO when the question is no longer whether to measure Scope 3 — but how fast, and at what defensibility.

Book a live demo Read the audited methodology →
01 — Manufacturing Scope 3 · Tier-2 supplier emissions

CSRD audit-ready in 14 weeks across 9,000 suppliers — a 3,200-employee Tier-1 automotive supplier.

Industry context: Tier-1 automotive operators carry the heaviest disclosed Scope 3 burden of any mid-market segment. The operator profiled below replaced a spreadsheet stack inherited from a Big-4 advisory engagement and passed its first double-materiality assessment on schedule.

Book a live demo
M-01

Scope 3 Category 1 mapped across 9,000 active suppliers

The platform's supplier-engagement workspace replaced four parallel Excel trackers. Spend-based Tier-2 estimates were reconciled with supplier-provided activity data on a single audit trail.

9,000 suppliers onboarded
M-02

CSRD double-materiality assessment completed on first attempt

Pre-validated templates for the automotive segment removed 380 hours of stakeholder-mapping work. The IRO register was signed off by the audit committee in week 13.

14 weeks, end-to-end
M-03

Reporting cycle compressed from 11 months to 14 weeks

Quarterly internal reporting was migrated off the legacy stack. The sustainability lead's team reallocated ~62% of analyst time from data collection to mitigation projects.

−71% cycle time, year one
02 — Retail & Consumer Goods Scope 3 · Category 1 purchased goods

Mapped 42,000 SKUs to product-level footprints in 11 weeks — a 1,800-employee European apparel retailer.

Retail buyers measure at SKU speed, not at factory speed. The operator profiled below needed product-level carbon footprints across a portfolio that turns over 38% per season — without rebuilding its procurement data model.

Book a live demo
R-01

42,000 SKUs mapped to cradle-to-gate footprints

Material composition was matched against the platform's factor library; missing factors were escalated to a named-source review rather than dropped to a default assumption.

42,000 SKUs, 11 weeks
R-02

Supplier engagement moved out of email and into a workspace

1,400 tier-1 factories now respond to PCF requests through the supplier portal. Average response time dropped from 31 days to 9.

1,400 factories · 9-day response
R-03

Product-level reporting aligned to CSRD and the EU Digital Product Passport

The same SKU-level dataset feeds both the CSRD disclosure and the DPP registry submission, removing a duplicate data pipeline that had run in parallel for two reporting cycles.

One source, two regimes
03 — Financial Services PCAF-aligned financed emissions

PCAF-aligned financed-emissions disclosure ready in 19 weeks — a mid-market European private bank.

Financial-services buyers care less about operational tCO₂e and more about portfolio attribution. The operator profiled below needed PCAF Option 3 scoring across four asset classes and a CSRD-aligned double-materiality output for the same control perimeter.

Book a live demo
F-01

€48B AUM scored against PCAF across four asset classes

The platform's PCAF templates cover listed equity, corporate debt, real estate, and project finance. Data-quality scores were recorded per holding per reporting period.

€48B · 4 asset classes
F-02

Double-materiality assessment aligned to CSRD and ECB expectations

The platform's pre-validated templates for financial services incorporated both CSRD ESRS alignment and the European Central Bank's 2024 supervisory expectations on climate risk.

CSRD + ECB, one workflow
F-03

Audit defensibility anchored to ISO 14064-3 validation

The methodology page for financed emissions was reviewed by the customer's external auditor before go-live, removing a six-week back-and-forth at year-end.

ISO 14064-3 anchored
04 — Pharma & Life Sciences Audit-grade traceability

First-cycle CSRD pass with every factor traceable to a named source — a 4,500-employee specialty pharma group.

Pharma buyers are bought on audit defensibility, not feature breadth. The operator profiled below required that every emission factor in its disclosure resolve to a documented source — and that the methodology survive a third-party limited assurance review without restatement.

Book a live demo
P-01

Every emission factor traceable to a named, auditable source

The platform's methodology page links each factor to its origin dataset. The pharma group's external assurance provider confirmed traceability across 100% of the disclosure boundary.

100% factor traceability
P-02

First-cycle CSRD pass rate held across the disclosure boundary

Scope 1, 2 and the material Scope 3 categories were disclosed on the first audit cycle — consistent with the 94% platform-wide first-cycle pass rate.

First-cycle pass · zero restatements
P-03

Validated methodology reduced assurance provider review time

Limited assurance review was completed in 4 weeks instead of the customer's prior 11-week benchmark. The Fraunhofer ISI methodology audit was referenced in the assurance opinion.

−63% assurance review time
Aggregate proof The four numbers a CFO will ask for
2,400+ Customer sustainability teams on the platform Across 38 countries; 142 employees in Berlin, SF, London, Singapore.
67% Average reduction in emissions-reporting time Measured within the first two quarters of onboarding.
4.6× Faster CSRD audit readiness vs. 11-month median 94% of customers achieve CSRD-ready reporting on first audit cycle.
11.4M tCO₂e of audited emissions data processed in 2025 SOC 2 Type II; ISO 14064-3 re-certified March 2025.

If your team is still on spreadsheets, your reporting cycle is the cost.

Book a live demo